| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Opposition to war against Iran ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Opposition to military action against Iran
According to most U.S. news networks, a majority of Americans support United States or Israeli military action against Iran. Other, more recent, polls point out that Americans "back a newly brokered nuclear deal with Iran by a 2-to-1 margin and are very wary of the United States resorting to military action against Tehran even if the historic diplomatic effort falls". Organised opposition to a possible future military attack against Iran by the United States (US) and/or Israel is known to have started during 2005–2006. Beginning in early 2005, journalists, activists and academics such as Seymour Hersh,〔〔 Scott Ritter,〔 Joseph Cirincione〔 and Jorge E. Hirsch〔 began publishing claims that United States' concerns over the allege threat posed by the possibility that Iran may have a nuclear weapons program might lead the US government to take military action against that country. These reports, and the concurrent escalation of tensions between Iran and some Western governments, prompted the formation of grassroots organisations, including Campaign Against Sanctions and Military Intervention in Iran in the US and the United Kingdom, to advocate against potential military strikes on Iran. Additionally, several individuals, grassroots organisations and international governmental organisations, including the Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed ElBaradei,〔 a former United Nations weapons inspector in Iraq, Scott Ritter,〔 Nobel Prize winners including Shirin Ebadi, Mairead Corrigan-Maguire and Betty Williams, Harold Pinter and Jody Williams,〔 Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament,〔 Code Pink,〔 the Non-Aligned Movement〔 of 118 states, and the Arab League, have publicly stated their opposition to such an attack.
==Reports of a potential military attack on Iran==
Opposition to a would-be military attack on Iran followed several claims that the United States and/or Israel might carry out such an attack, in relation to claims that Iran may try to produce nuclear weapons. Some analysts say that Iran's potential production of nuclear weapons is the real reason for an attack, while others say that it is an excuse. Noam Chomsky claims that the real reason for a would-be attack would be to "control Middle East energy resources", in particular petroleum. and physicist Jorge Hirsch claims that the real reason is that the US wishes to demonstrate its intent and capability to "use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear countries". Starting in 2005, these analysts, including Seymour Hersh, former UN weapons of mass destruction inspector in Iraq from 1991 to 1998, Scott Ritter,〔(Sleepwalking To Disaster In Iran ), April 1, 2005, Scott Ritter〕 Joseph Cirincione, director for non-proliferation at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,〔(Fool Me Twice ), March 27, 2006, Joseph Cirincione, Foreign Policy〕 Professor at the University of San Francisco and Middle East editor for the Foreign Policy in Focus, Stephen Zunes〔(The United States, Israel, and the Possible Attack on Iran ), Stephen Zunes, May 2, 2006, ZNet〕 claimed that the United States planned a military attack against Iran. Philip Giraldi, a former CIA officer,〔(Deep Background ), August 1, 2005, Philip Giraldi, The American Conservative〕 physicist Jorge E. Hirsch,〔(A 'Legal' US Nuclear Attack Against Iran ), Jorge Hirsch, November 12, 2005〕〔( America and Iran: At the Brink of the Abyss ), Jorge Hirsch, February 20, 2006〕 and Seymour Hersh 〔( The Iran plans ), Seymour Hersh, The New Yorker Mag., April 8, 2006〕 claimed that the attack could be expected to use nuclear weapons, in line with the US Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations which was revised in March 2005.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Opposition to military action against Iran」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|